How did the editor respond to our suggestion
Web16 de out. de 2015 · Tips for Writing Responses to Reviewers. 1. Do not use an aggressive or defensive tone. 2. Never use one reviewer’s response against another. 3. Thank reviewers for good suggestions. 4. Say ... WebTake a day (or at least a couple of hours), and fully embrace the editor's suggestions. Think about why h/she made them, and think about how you would revise your paper to fully incorporate his/her suggestions, and in what aspects it would make the paper better. …
How did the editor respond to our suggestion
Did you know?
WebAddress all points raised by the editor and reviewers Describe the revisions to your manuscript in your response letter Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if this is the case, explain why in your response letter) Web9 de jul. de 2024 · How to Reach Out. Most editors say that the best way to ask for their input is by email. This gives editors time to think about the feedback they’d like to give, …
Web1 de out. de 2024 · Let's. It's a form of imperative that we can use to make suggestions. Let’s is a contraction for the words let us. It is used to tell someone what you want to do with them. Let's go. Let's take a break. Let's not go on a picnic. Let’s not argue about money. Web7 de mai. de 2024 · It is up to you. The editors clearly think you should have a chance to respond to the reviewers, then they will evaluate if your paper is wowrthwhile for publication. The review is not a democratic process, the editor may at any point overrule the suggestion of the reviewers. The editor may even have an idea about the topic you are …
Web18 de mai. de 2016 · Answer: I think you should just be honest and mention to the editor that while you agree with the reviewer’s suggestion, you had not thought of this at the … Web12 de out. de 2024 · The response letter will typically begin with a summary of changes, pointing out new data and new analyses performed in response to the most essential criticisms of all the reviewers. Note that, at your discretion, the response may include figures and tables that are for the reviewers' benefit but will not go into the manuscript or …
Web17 de jan. de 2024 · The handling Editor, based on all the information available, including referee reports, can nominate the paper for its particular interest, as well as clarity of …
Web23 de abr. de 2024 · In “To the Reader,” Thomas Feyer, the Letters editor since 1999, explains what qualifies as a publishable letter to the editor. As you read, highlight or underline Mr. Feyer’s suggestions. pitavastatin impurityWebDear Editor, We appreciate you and the reviewers for your precious time in reviewing our paper and providing valuable comments. It was your valuable and insightful comments that led to possible improvements in the current version. The authors have carefully considered the comments and tried our best to address every one of them. pitavastatin generic availableWebIt is not a guideline on ‘how to write a journal paper’ but useful comments and suggestions are provided. The final part of this chapter covers questions related to the submission and revision ... ban\\u0027s phWeb18 de jun. de 2015 · If a reviewer provides suggestions for improvements, ideally the authors should respond to them. This does not mean that the author will necessarily … pitavastatin impuritiesWeb20 de mar. de 2024 · PA. When making these decisions, based on your judgement, which is in turn informed by your values and experience, an editor has three sacred loyalties - in … pitavastatin hydrophilicWebpraised. Errors were ignored, and no suggestions for im-provement were made. No grade was marked on any paper. One week from the time the first papers were written, they were returned to the students. Students were asked to reread their papers, noting any comment that had been written on them. They were asked to consider how they might ban\\u0027s pnWebEditors and reviewers are not infallible; on the other hand, there should usually be a reason why the remark has been made.You may think it irrelevant, but the reviewer obviously … ban\\u0027s pw